Please select relevant prognosis predictor.
Root development* Dry time* Wet time physiologic media Due to the limited number of cases with the selected root development stage the chosen immature stage is combined with other immature stages (1-5). If the tooth has been stored in a unphysiologic medias such as tapwater, chlorhexidine, chloramine, alcohol or other sterilizing solutions no prognosis calculation is possible.
Physiologic medias: Saliva, saline, milk, culture medias
Years Result Type Pulp necrosis (PnPlot) Dear colleague, our data base included 110 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 92 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 27 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 23 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 8 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 7 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 19 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 16 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 74 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 62 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 23 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 20 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 23 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 20 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 9 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 9 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 110 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 92 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 27 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 23 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 8 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 7 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 19 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 16 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 74 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 62 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 23 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 20 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 51 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 43 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 9 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 9 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 110 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 92 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 27 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 23 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 8 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 7 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 19 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 16 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 74 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 62 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 23 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 20 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 23 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 20 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 51 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 43 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 290 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 232 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 66 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 53 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 18 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 14 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 18 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 14 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 182 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 146 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 77 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 66 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 105 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 82 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 9 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 9 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 290 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 232 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 66 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 53 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 18 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 14 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 48 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 39 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 182 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 146 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 77 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 66 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 105 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 82 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 9 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 9 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 290 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 232 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 66 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 53 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 18 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 14 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 48 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 39 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 182 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 146 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 77 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 66 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 105 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 82 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 9 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 9 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Infection related resorption (InflammatoryPlot) Dear colleague, our data base included 110 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 92 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 27 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 23 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 8 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 7 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 19 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 16 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 74 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 62 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 23 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 20 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 51 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 43 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 9 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 9 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 9 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 9 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 110 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 92 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 27 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 23 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 8 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 7 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 19 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 16 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 74 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 62 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 23 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 20 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 51 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 43 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 9 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 9 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 110 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 92 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 27 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 23 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below
Dear colleague, our data base included 8 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 7 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 19 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 16 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 74 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 62 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 23 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 20 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 51 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 43 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 290 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 232 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 66 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 53 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 18 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 14 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 48 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 39 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 182 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 146 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 77 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 66 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 105 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 82 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 42 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 35 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 290 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 232 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 66 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 53 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 18 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 14 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 48 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 39 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 182 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 146 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 105 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 82 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 42 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 35 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 290 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 232 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 66 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 53 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 18 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 14 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 48 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 39 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 182 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 146 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 77 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 66 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 105 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 82 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 42 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 35 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Ankylosis resorption (AnkylosisPlot) Dear colleague, our data base included 110 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 92 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 27 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 23 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 8 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 7 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 19 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 16 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 74 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 62 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 23 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 20 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 51 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 43 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 9 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 9 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 110 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 92 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 27 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 23 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 8 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 7 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 19 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 16 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 74 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 62 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 23 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 20 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 51 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 43 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 9 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 9 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 110 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 92 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 27 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 23 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 8 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 7 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 19 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 16 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 74 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 62 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 23 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 20 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 51 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 43 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 9 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 9 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 290 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 232 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 66 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 53 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 18 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 14 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 18 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 14 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 182 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 146 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 77 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 66 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 105 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 82 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 105 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 82 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 290 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 232 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 66 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 53 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 18 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 14 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 48 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 39 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 182 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 146 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 77 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 66 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 105 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 82 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 42 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 35 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 290 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 232 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 66 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 53 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 66 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 53 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 18 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 14 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 48 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 39 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 182 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 146 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 77 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 66 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 105 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 82 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 42 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 35 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Tooth Loss (ToothlossPlot) Dear colleague, our data base included 110 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 92 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 27 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 23 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 8 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 7 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 19 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 16 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 74 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 62 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 23 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 20 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 51 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 43 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 9 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 9 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 110 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 92 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 27 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 23 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 8 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 7 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 19 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 16 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 74 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 62 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 23 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 20 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 51 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 43 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 9 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 9 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 110 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 92 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 27 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 23 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 8 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 7 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below./p>
Dear colleague, our data base included 8 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 7 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 74 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 62 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 23 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 20 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 51 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 43 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 9 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 9 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 290 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 232 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 66 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 53 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 18 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 14 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 48 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 39 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 182 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 146 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 77 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 66 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 105 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 82 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 42 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 35 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 290 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 232 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 66 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 53 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 18 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 14 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 48 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 39 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 182 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 146 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 77 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 66 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 105 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 82 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 42 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 35 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 290 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 232 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 66 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 53 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 18 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 14 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 48 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 39 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 182 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 146 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 77 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 66 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 105 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 82 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 9 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 9 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Statistical overview (text) Dear colleague, our data base included 110 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 92 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Results, one year after the injury Number of diagnosed events Estimated risk (%) 95% confidence interval Tooth loss 3 2.7 [ 0 - 5.7 ] Pulp necrosis 74 70 [ 61.4 - 78.6 ] Pulp canal obliteration 28 26.4 [ 18.1 - 34.6 ] Ankylosis 40 36.4 [ 27.4 - 45.4 ] Inflammatory root resorption 38 34.5 [ 25.7 - 43.4 ] Surface resorption 2 1.8 [ 0 - 4.3 ] Bone loss 4 3.6 [ 0.1 - 7.1 ]
Results, three years after the injury Number of diagnosed events Estimated risk (%) 95% confidence interval Tooth loss 22 23 [ 14.4 - 31.5 ] Pulp necrosis 78 70.9 [ 62.4 - 79.4 ] Pulp canal obliteration 30 28.2 [ 19.8 - 36.6 ] Ankylosis 45 41.5 [ 32.2 - 50.8 ] Inflammatory root resorption 40 36.5 [ 27.5 - 45.5 ] Surface resorption 2 1.8 [ 0 - 4.3 ] Bone loss 4 3.6 [ 0.1 - 7.1 ]
Results, ten years after the injury Number of diagnosed events Estimated risk (%) 95% confidence interval Tooth loss 40 47.3 [ 35.9 - 58.8 ] Pulp necrosis 78 70.9 [ 62.4 - 79.4 ] Pulp canal obliteration 32 > 29.1 not available Ankylosis 46 42.8 [ 33.3 - 52.2 ] Inflammatory root resorption 41 37.6 [ 28.5 - 46.7 ] Surface resorption 3 3 [ 0 - 6.3 ] Bone loss 4 3.6 [ 0.1 - 7.1 ]
Dear colleague, our data base included 27 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 23 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Results, one year after the injury Number of diagnosed events Estimated risk (%) 95% confidence interval Tooth loss 0 0 not available Pulp necrosis 13 51.9 [ 33 - 70.7 ] Pulp canal obliteration 10 40.7 [ 22.2 - 59.3 ] Ankylosis 5 22.2 [ 6.5 - 37.9 ] Inflammatory root resorption 7 29.6 [ 12.4 - 46.9 ] Surface resorption 0 0 not available Bone loss 0 3.7 [ 0 - 10.8 ]
Results, three years after the injury Number of diagnosed events Estimated risk (%) 95% confidence interval Tooth loss 2 7.9 [ 0 - 18.1 ] Pulp necrosis 15 55.6 [ 36.8 - 74.3 ] Pulp canal obliteration 12 > 44.4 not available Ankylosis 7 25.9 [ 9.4 - 42.5 ] Inflammatory root resorption 8 29.6 [ 12.4 - 46.9 ] Surface resorption 0 0 not available Bone loss 1 3.7 [ 0 - 10.8 ]
Results, ten years after the injury Number of diagnosed events Estimated risk (%) 95% confidence interval Tooth loss 5 25 [ 5.6 - 44.4 ] Pulp necrosis 15 55.6 [ 36.8 - 74.3 ] Pulp canal obliteration 12 > 44.4 not available Ankylosis 7 25.9 [ 9.4 - 42.5 ] Inflammatory root resorption 8 29.6 [ 12.4 - 46.9 ] Surface resorption 0 0 not available Bone loss 1 3.7 [ 0 - 10.8 ]
Dear colleague, our data base included 8 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 7 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Results, one year after the injury Number of diagnosed events Estimated risk (%) 95% confidence interval Tooth loss 0 0 [ 0 - 36.9 ] Pulp necrosis 2 37.5 [ 6.5 - 68.5 ] Pulp canal obliteration 3 50 [ 15.4 - 84.6 ] Ankylosis 0 0 [ 0 - 36.9 ] Inflammatory root resorption 0 12.5 [ 0 - 32.9 ] Surface resorption 0 0 [ 0 - 36.9 ] Bone loss 0 12.5 [ 0 - 32.9 ]
Results, three years after the injury Number of diagnosed events Estimated risk (%) 95% confidence interval Tooth loss 0 0 [ 0 - 36.9 ] Pulp necrosis 3 50 [ 19.6 - 80.4 ] Pulp canal obliteration 4 > 50 not available Ankylosis 0 0 [ 0 - 36.9 ] Inflammatory root resorption 0 12.5 [ 0 - 32.9 ] Surface resorption 0 0 [ 0 - 36.9 ] Bone loss 0 12.5 [ 0 - 32.9 ]
Results, ten years after the injury Number of diagnosed events Estimated risk (%) 95% confidence interval Tooth loss 0 0 [ 0 - 60.2 ] Pulp necrosis 4 50 [ 19.6 - 80.4 ] Pulp canal obliteration 4 > 50 not available Ankylosis 0 0 [ 0 - 60.2 ] Inflammatory root resorption 1 12.5 [ 0 - 32.9 ] Surface resorption 0 0 [ 0 - 60.2 ] Bone loss 1 12.5 [ 0 - 32.9 ]
Dear colleague, our data base included 19 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 16 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Results, one year after the injury Number of diagnosed events Estimated risk (%) 95% confidence interval Tooth loss 0 0 not available Pulp necrosis 10 57.9 [ 35.7 - 80.1 ] Pulp canal obliteration 6 36.8 [ 15.2 - 58.5 ] Ankylosis 5 31.6 [ 10.7 - 52.5 ] Inflammatory root resorption 6 36.8 [ 15.2 - 58.5 ] Surface resorption 0 0 not available Bone loss 0 0 not available
Results, three years after the injury Number of diagnosed events Estimated risk (%) 95% confidence interval Tooth loss 2 11.6 [ 0 - 26 ] Pulp necrosis 11 57.9 [ 35.7 - 80.1 ] Pulp canal obliteration 8 > 42.1 not available Ankylosis 7 36.8 [ 15.2 - 58.5 ] Inflammatory root resorption 7 36.8 [ 15.2 - 58.5 ] Surface resorption 0 0 not available Bone loss 0 0 not available
Results, ten years after the injury Number of diagnosed events Estimated risk (%) 95% confidence interval Tooth loss 4 40.1 [ 13.5 - 66.8 ] Pulp necrosis 11 57.9 [ 35.7 - 80.1 ] Pulp canal obliteration 8 > 42.1 not available Ankylosis 7 36.8 [ 15.2 - 58.5 ] Inflammatory root resorption 7 36.8 [ 15.2 - 58.5 ] Surface resorption 0 0 not available Bone loss 0 0 not available
Dear colleague, our data base included 74 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 62 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Results, one year after the injury Number of diagnosed events Estimated risk (%) 95% confidence interval Tooth loss 2 2.7 [ 0 - 6.3 ] Pulp necrosis 52 74.3 [ 64.4 - 84.3 ] Pulp canal obliteration 16 23 [ 13.4 - 32.6 ] Ankylosis 28 37.8 [ 26.8 - 48.9 ] Inflammatory root resorption 27 36.5 [ 25.5 - 47.5 ] Surface resorption 2 2.7 [ 0 - 6.4 ] Bone loss 3 4.1 [ 0 - 8.5 ]
Results, three years after the injury Number of diagnosed events Estimated risk (%) 95% confidence interval Tooth loss 16 24.7 [ 14 - 35.4 ] Pulp necrosis 55 74.3 [ 64.4 - 84.3 ] Pulp canal obliteration 17 24.3 [ 14.5 - 34.1 ] Ankylosis 32 44.4 [ 32.8 - 56.1 ] Inflammatory root resorption 29 39.4 [ 28.2 - 50.6 ] Surface resorption 2 2.7 [ 0 - 6.4 ] Bone loss 3 4.1 [ 0 - 8.5 ]
Results, ten years after the injury Number of diagnosed events Estimated risk (%) 95% confidence interval Tooth loss 28 49.3 [ 35.4 - 63.3 ] Pulp necrosis 55 74.3 [ 64.4 - 84.3 ] Pulp canal obliteration 19 > 25.7 not available Ankylosis 33 46.3 [ 34.5 - 58.1 ] Inflammatory root resorption 30 41 [ 29.7 - 52.4 ] Surface resorption 3 4.4 [ 0 - 9.4 ] Bone loss 3 4.1 [ 0 - 8.5 ]
Dear colleague, our data base included 23 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 20 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Results, one year after the injury Number of diagnosed events Estimated risk (%) 95% confidence interval Tooth loss 0 4.3 [ 0 - 12.4 ] Pulp necrosis 12 56.5 [ 36.3 - 76.8 ] Pulp canal obliteration 8 39.1 [ 19.2 - 59.1 ] Ankylosis 8 43.5 [ 25.7 - 61.3 ] Inflammatory root resorption 8 34.8 [ 15.3 - 54.2 ] Surface resorption 0 0 [ 0 - 0 ] Bone loss 0 0 not available
Results, three years after the injury Number of diagnosed events Estimated risk (%) 95% confidence interval Tooth loss 3 20.2 [ 4 - 36.4 ] Pulp necrosis 13 56.5 [ 36.3 - 76.8 ] Pulp canal obliteration 10 > 43.5 not available Ankylosis 10 43.5 [ 25.7 - 61.3 ] Inflammatory root resorption 8 34.8 [ 15.3 - 54.2 ] Surface resorption 0 0 [ 0 - 0 ] Bone loss 0 0 not available
Results, ten years after the injury Number of diagnosed events Estimated risk (%) 95% confidence interval Tooth loss 6 33 [ 13.1 - 53 ] Pulp necrosis 13 56.5 [ 36.3 - 76.8 ] Pulp canal obliteration 10 > 43.5 not available Ankylosis 10 43.5 [ 25.7 - 61.3 ] Inflammatory root resorption 8 34.8 [ 15.3 - 54.2 ] Surface resorption 1 6.1 [ 0 - 17.8 ] Bone loss 0 0 not available
Dear colleague, our data base included 51 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 43 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Results, one year after the injury Number of diagnosed events Estimated risk (%) 95% confidence interval Tooth loss 1 2 [ 0 - 5.6 ] Pulp necrosis 40 82.4 [ 71.9 - 92.8 ] Pulp canal obliteration 7 15.7 [ 5.7 - 25.7 ] Ankylosis 18 35.3 [ 22.2 - 48.4 ] Inflammatory root resorption 19 37.3 [ 24 - 50.5 ] Surface resorption 2 3.9 [ 0 - 9.2 ] Bone loss 3 5.9 [ 0 - 12.3 ]
Results, three years after the injury Number of diagnosed events Estimated risk (%) 95% confidence interval Tooth loss 12 26.1 [ 13.1 - 39 ] Pulp necrosis 42 82.4 [ 71.9 - 92.8 ] Pulp canal obliteration 7 15.7 [ 5.7 - 25.7 ] Ankylosis 22 44.5 [ 30.5 - 58.6 ] Inflammatory root resorption 21 41.5 [ 27.9 - 55.1 ] Surface resorption 2 3.9 [ 0 - 9.2 ] Bone loss 3 5.9 [ 0 - 12.3 ]
Results, ten years after the injury Number of diagnosed events Estimated risk (%) 95% confidence interval Tooth loss 22 54 [ 38 - 70 ] Pulp necrosis 42 82.4 [ 71.9 - 92.8 ] Pulp canal obliteration 9 > 17.6 not available Ankylosis 23 47.1 [ 32.9 - 61.4 ] Inflammatory root resorption 22 43.9 [ 30.1 - 57.8 ] Surface resorption 2 3.9 [ 0 - 9.2 ] Bone loss 3 5.9 [ 0 - 12.3 ]
Dear colleague, our data base included 9 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 9 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Results, one year after the injury Number of diagnosed events Estimated risk (%) 95% confidence interval Tooth loss 0 11.1 [ 0 - 29.4 ] Pulp necrosis 7 88.9 [ 68.4 - 100 ] Pulp canal obliteration 1 > 11.1 not available Ankylosis 5 66.7 [ 35.9 - 97.5 ] Inflammatory root resorption 2 33.3 [ 2.5 - 64.1 ] Surface resorption 0 0 not available Bone loss 0 0 not available
Results, three years after the injury Number of diagnosed events Estimated risk (%) 95% confidence interval Tooth loss 4 58.3 [ 31 - 85.7 ] Pulp necrosis 8 > 88.9 not available Pulp canal obliteration 1 > 11.1 not available Ankylosis 6 66.7 [ 35.9 - 97.5 ] Inflammatory root resorption 3 33.3 [ 2.5 - 64.1 ] Surface resorption 0 0 not available Bone loss 0 0 not available
Results, ten years after the injury Number of diagnosed events Estimated risk (%) 95% confidence interval Tooth loss 6 86.1 [ 70.9 - 100 ] Pulp necrosis 8 > 88.9 not available Pulp canal obliteration 1 > 11.1 not available Ankylosis 6 66.7 [ 35.9 - 97.5 ] Inflammatory root resorption 3 > 33.3 not available Surface resorption 0 0 not available Bone loss 0 0 not available
Dear colleague, our data base included 110 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 92 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Results, one year after the injury Number of diagnosed events Estimated risk (%) 95% confidence interval Tooth loss 3 2.7 [ 0 - 5.7 ] Pulp necrosis 74 70 [ 61.4 - 78.6 ] Pulp canal obliteration 28 26.4 [ 18.1 - 34.6 ] Ankylosis 40 36.4 [ 27.4 - 45.4 ] Inflammatory root resorption 38 34.5 [ 25.7 - 43.4 ] Surface resorption 2 1.8 [ 0 - 4.3 ] Bone loss 4 3.6 [ 0.1 - 7.1 ]
Results, three years after the injury Number of diagnosed events Estimated risk (%) 95% confidence interval Tooth loss 22 23 [ 14.4 - 31.5 ] Pulp necrosis 78 70.9 [ 62.4 - 79.4 ] Pulp canal obliteration 30 28.2 [ 19.8 - 36.6 ] Ankylosis 45 41.5 [ 32.2 - 50.8 ] Inflammatory root resorption 40 36.5 [ 27.5 - 45.5 ] Surface resorption 2 1.8 [ 0 - 4.3 ] Bone loss 4 3.6 [ 0.1 - 7.1 ]
Results, ten years after the injury Number of diagnosed events Estimated risk (%) 95% confidence interval Tooth loss 40 47.3 [ 35.9 - 58.8 ] Pulp necrosis 78 70.9 [ 62.4 - 79.4 ] Pulp canal obliteration 32 > 29.1 not available Ankylosis 46 42.8 [ 33.3 - 52.2 ] Inflammatory root resorption 41 37.6 [ 28.5 - 46.7 ] Surface resorption 3 3 [ 0 - 6.3 ] Bone loss 4 3.6 [ 0.1 - 7.1 ]
Dear colleague, our data base included 27 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 23 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Results, one year after the injury Number of diagnosed events Estimated risk (%) 95% confidence interval Tooth loss 0 0 not available Pulp necrosis 13 51.9 [ 33 - 70.7 ] Pulp canal obliteration 10 40.7 [ 22.2 - 59.3 ] Ankylosis 5 22.2 [ 6.5 - 37.9 ] Inflammatory root resorption 7 29.6 [ 12.4 - 46.9 ] Surface resorption 0 0 not available Bone loss 0 3.7 [ 0 - 10.8 ]
Results, three years after the injury Number of diagnosed events Estimated risk (%) 95% confidence interval Tooth loss 2 7.9 [ 0 - 18.1 ] Pulp necrosis 15 55.6 [ 36.8 - 74.3 ] Pulp canal obliteration 12 > 44.4 not available Ankylosis 7 25.9 [ 9.4 - 42.5 ] Inflammatory root resorption 8 29.6 [ 12.4 - 46.9 ] Surface resorption 0 0 not available Bone loss 1 3.7 [ 0 - 10.8 ]
Results, ten years after the injury Number of diagnosed events Estimated risk (%) 95% confidence interval Tooth loss 5 25 [ 5.6 - 44.4 ] Pulp necrosis 15 55.6 [ 36.8 - 74.3 ] Pulp canal obliteration 12 > 44.4 not available Ankylosis 7 25.9 [ 9.4 - 42.5 ] Inflammatory root resorption 8 29.6 [ 12.4 - 46.9 ] Surface resorption 0 0 not available Bone loss 1 3.7 [ 0 - 10.8 ]
Dear colleague, our data base included 8 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 7 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Results, one year after the injury Number of diagnosed events Estimated risk (%) 95% confidence interval Tooth loss 0 0 [ 0 - 36.9 ] Pulp necrosis 2 37.5 [ 6.5 - 68.5 ] Pulp canal obliteration 3 50 [ 15.4 - 84.6 ] Ankylosis 0 0 [ 0 - 36.9 ] Inflammatory root resorption 0 12.5 [ 0 - 32.9 ] Surface resorption 0 0 [ 0 - 36.9 ] Bone loss 0 12.5 [ 0 - 32.9 ]
Results, three years after the injury Number of diagnosed events Estimated risk (%) 95% confidence interval Tooth loss 0 0 [ 0 - 36.9 ] Pulp necrosis 3 50 [ 19.6 - 80.4 ] Pulp canal obliteration 4 > 50 not available Ankylosis 0 0 [ 0 - 36.9 ] Inflammatory root resorption 0 12.5 [ 0 - 32.9 ] Surface resorption 0 0 [ 0 - 36.9 ] Bone loss 0 12.5 [ 0 - 32.9 ]
Results, ten years after the injury Number of diagnosed events Estimated risk (%) 95% confidence interval Tooth loss 0 0 [ 0 - 60.2 ] Pulp necrosis 4 50 [ 19.6 - 80.4 ] Pulp canal obliteration 4 > 50 not available Ankylosis 0 0 [ 0 - 60.2 ] Inflammatory root resorption 1 12.5 [ 0 - 32.9 ] Surface resorption 0 0 [ 0 - 60.2 ] Bone loss 1 12.5 [ 0 - 32.9 ]
Dear colleague, our data base included 19 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 16 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Results, one year after the injury Number of diagnosed events Estimated risk (%) 95% confidence interval Tooth loss 0 0 not available Pulp necrosis 10 57.9 [ 35.7 - 80.1 ] Pulp canal obliteration 6 36.8 [ 15.2 - 58.5 ] Ankylosis 5 31.6 [ 10.7 - 52.5 ] Inflammatory root resorption 6 36.8 [ 15.2 - 58.5 ] Surface resorption 0 0 not available Bone loss 0 0 not available
Results, three years after the injury Number of diagnosed events Estimated risk (%) 95% confidence interval Tooth loss 2 11.6 [ 0 - 26 ] Pulp necrosis 11 57.9 [ 35.7 - 80.1 ] Pulp canal obliteration 8 > 42.1 not available Ankylosis 7 36.8 [ 15.2 - 58.5 ] Inflammatory root resorption 7 36.8 [ 15.2 - 58.5 ] Surface resorption 0 0 not available Bone loss 0 0 not available
Results, ten years after the injury Number of diagnosed events Estimated risk (%) 95% confidence interval Tooth loss 4 40.1 [ 13.5 - 66.8 ] Pulp necrosis 11 57.9 [ 35.7 - 80.1 ] Pulp canal obliteration 8 > 42.1 not available Ankylosis 7 36.8 [ 15.2 - 58.5 ] Inflammatory root resorption 7 36.8 [ 15.2 - 58.5 ] Surface resorption 0 0 not available Bone loss 0 0 not available
Dear colleague, our data base included 74 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 62 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Results, one year after the injury Number of diagnosed events Estimated risk (%) 95% confidence interval Tooth loss 2 2.7 [ 0 - 6.3 ] Pulp necrosis 52 74.3 [ 64.4 - 84.3 ] Pulp canal obliteration 16 23 [ 13.4 - 32.6 ] Ankylosis 28 37.8 [ 26.8 - 48.9 ] Inflammatory root resorption 27 36.5 [ 25.5 - 47.5 ] Surface resorption 2 2.7 [ 0 - 6.4 ] Bone loss 3 4.1 [ 0 - 8.5 ]
Results, three years after the injury Number of diagnosed events Estimated risk (%) 95% confidence interval Tooth loss 16 24.7 [ 14 - 35.4 ] Pulp necrosis 55 74.3 [ 64.4 - 84.3 ] Pulp canal obliteration 17 24.3 [ 14.5 - 34.1 ] Ankylosis 32 44.4 [ 32.8 - 56.1 ] Inflammatory root resorption 29 39.4 [ 28.2 - 50.6 ] Surface resorption 2 2.7 [ 0 - 6.4 ] Bone loss 3 4.1 [ 0 - 8.5 ]
Results, ten years after the injury Number of diagnosed events Estimated risk (%) 95% confidence interval Tooth loss 28 49.3 [ 35.4 - 63.3 ] Pulp necrosis 55 74.3 [ 64.4 - 84.3 ] Pulp canal obliteration 19 > 25.7 not available Ankylosis 33 46.3 [ 34.5 - 58.1 ] Inflammatory root resorption 30 41 [ 29.7 - 52.4 ] Surface resorption 3 4.4 [ 0 - 9.4 ] Bone loss 3 4.1 [ 0 - 8.5 ]
Dear colleague, our data base included 23 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 20 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Results, one year after the injury Number of diagnosed events Estimated risk (%) 95% confidence interval Tooth loss 0 4.3 [ 0 - 12.4 ] Pulp necrosis 12 56.5 [ 36.3 - 76.8 ] Pulp canal obliteration 8 39.1 [ 19.2 - 59.1 ] Ankylosis 8 43.5 [ 25.7 - 61.3 ] Inflammatory root resorption 8 34.8 [ 15.3 - 54.2 ] Surface resorption 0 0 [ 0 - 0 ] Bone loss 0 0 not available
Results, three years after the injury Number of diagnosed events Estimated risk (%) 95% confidence interval Tooth loss 3 20.2 [ 4 - 36.4 ] Pulp necrosis 13 56.5 [ 36.3 - 76.8 ] Pulp canal obliteration 10 > 43.5 not available Ankylosis 10 43.5 [ 25.7 - 61.3 ] Inflammatory root resorption 8 34.8 [ 15.3 - 54.2 ] Surface resorption 0 0 [ 0 - 0 ] Bone loss 0 0 not available
Results, ten years after the injury Number of diagnosed events Estimated risk (%) 95% confidence interval Tooth loss 6 33 [ 13.1 - 53 ] Pulp necrosis 13 56.5 [ 36.3 - 76.8 ] Pulp canal obliteration 10 > 43.5 not available Ankylosis 10 43.5 [ 25.7 - 61.3 ] Inflammatory root resorption 8 34.8 [ 15.3 - 54.2 ] Surface resorption 1 6.1 [ 0 - 17.8 ] Bone loss 0 0 not available
Dear colleague, our data base included 51 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 43 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Results, one year after the injury Number of diagnosed events Estimated risk (%) 95% confidence interval Tooth loss 1 2 [ 0 - 5.6 ] Pulp necrosis 40 82.4 [ 71.9 - 92.8 ] Pulp canal obliteration 7 15.7 [ 5.7 - 25.7 ] Ankylosis 18 35.3 [ 22.2 - 48.4 ] Inflammatory root resorption 19 37.3 [ 24 - 50.5 ] Surface resorption 2 3.9 [ 0 - 9.2 ] Bone loss 3 5.9 [ 0 - 12.3 ]
Results, three years after the injury Number of diagnosed events Estimated risk (%) 95% confidence interval Tooth loss 12 26.1 [ 13.1 - 39 ] Pulp necrosis 42 82.4 [ 71.9 - 92.8 ] Pulp canal obliteration 7 15.7 [ 5.7 - 25.7 ] Ankylosis 22 44.5 [ 30.5 - 58.6 ] Inflammatory root resorption 21 41.5 [ 27.9 - 55.1 ] Surface resorption 2 3.9 [ 0 - 9.2 ] Bone loss 3 5.9 [ 0 - 12.3 ]
Results, ten years after the injury Number of diagnosed events Estimated risk (%) 95% confidence interval Tooth loss 22 54 [ 38 - 70 ] Pulp necrosis 42 82.4 [ 71.9 - 92.8 ] Pulp canal obliteration 9 > 17.6 not available Ankylosis 23 47.1 [ 32.9 - 61.4 ] Inflammatory root resorption 22 43.9 [ 30.1 - 57.8 ] Surface resorption 2 3.9 [ 0 - 9.2 ] Bone loss 3 5.9 [ 0 - 12.3 ]
Dear colleague, our data base included 9 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 9 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Results, one year after the injury Number of diagnosed events Estimated risk (%) 95% confidence interval Tooth loss 0 11.1 [ 0 - 29.4 ] Pulp necrosis 7 88.9 [ 68.4 - 100 ] Pulp canal obliteration 1 > 11.1 not available Ankylosis 5 66.7 [ 35.9 - 97.5 ] Inflammatory root resorption 2 33.3 [ 2.5 - 64.1 ] Surface resorption 0 0 not available Bone loss 0 0 not available
Results, three years after the injury Number of diagnosed events Estimated risk (%) 95% confidence interval Tooth loss 4 58.3 [ 31 - 85.7 ] Pulp necrosis 8 > 88.9 not available Pulp canal obliteration 1 > 11.1 not available Ankylosis 6 66.7 [ 35.9 - 97.5 ] Inflammatory root resorption 3 33.3 [ 2.5 - 64.1 ] Surface resorption 0 0 not available Bone loss 0 0 not available
Results, ten years after the injury Number of diagnosed events Estimated risk (%) 95% confidence interval Tooth loss 6 86.1 [ 70.9 - 100 ] Pulp necrosis 8 > 88.9 not available Pulp canal obliteration 1 > 11.1 not available Ankylosis 6 66.7 [ 35.9 - 97.5 ] Inflammatory root resorption 3 > 33.3 not available Surface resorption 0 0 not available Bone loss 0 0 not available
Dear colleague, our data base included 110 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 92 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Results, one year after the injury Number of diagnosed events Estimated risk (%) 95% confidence interval Tooth loss 3 2.7 [ 0 - 5.7 ] Pulp necrosis 74 70 [ 61.4 - 78.6 ] Pulp canal obliteration 28 26.4 [ 18.1 - 34.6 ] Ankylosis 40 36.4 [ 27.4 - 45.4 ] Inflammatory root resorption 38 34.5 [ 25.7 - 43.4 ] Surface resorption 2 1.8 [ 0 - 4.3 ] Bone loss 4 3.6 [ 0.1 - 7.1 ]
Results, three years after the injury Number of diagnosed events Estimated risk (%) 95% confidence interval Tooth loss 22 23 [ 14.4 - 31.5 ] Pulp necrosis 78 70.9 [ 62.4 - 79.4 ] Pulp canal obliteration 30 28.2 [ 19.8 - 36.6 ] Ankylosis 45 41.5 [ 32.2 - 50.8 ] Inflammatory root resorption 40 36.5 [ 27.5 - 45.5 ] Surface resorption 2 1.8 [ 0 - 4.3 ] Bone loss 4 3.6 [ 0.1 - 7.1 ]
Results, ten years after the injury Number of diagnosed events Estimated risk (%) 95% confidence interval Tooth loss 40 47.3 [ 35.9 - 58.8 ] Pulp necrosis 78 70.9 [ 62.4 - 79.4 ] Pulp canal obliteration 32 > 29.1 not available Ankylosis 46 42.8 [ 33.3 - 52.2 ] Inflammatory root resorption 41 37.6 [ 28.5 - 46.7 ] Surface resorption 3 3 [ 0 - 6.3 ] Bone loss 4 3.6 [ 0.1 - 7.1 ]
Dear colleague, our data base included 27 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 23 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Results, one year after the injury Number of diagnosed events Estimated risk (%) 95% confidence interval Tooth loss 0 0 not available Pulp necrosis 13 51.9 [ 33 - 70.7 ] Pulp canal obliteration 10 40.7 [ 22.2 - 59.3 ] Ankylosis 5 22.2 [ 6.5 - 37.9 ] Inflammatory root resorption 7 29.6 [ 12.4 - 46.9 ] Surface resorption 0 0 not available Bone loss 0 3.7 [ 0 - 10.8 ]
Results, three years after the injury Number of diagnosed events Estimated risk (%) 95% confidence interval Tooth loss 2 7.9 [ 0 - 18.1 ] Pulp necrosis 15 55.6 [ 36.8 - 74.3 ] Pulp canal obliteration 12 > 44.4 not available Ankylosis 7 25.9 [ 9.4 - 42.5 ] Inflammatory root resorption 8 29.6 [ 12.4 - 46.9 ] Surface resorption 0 0 not available Bone loss 1 3.7 [ 0 - 10.8 ]
Results, ten years after the injury Number of diagnosed events Estimated risk (%) 95% confidence interval Tooth loss 5 25 [ 5.6 - 44.4 ] Pulp necrosis 15 55.6 [ 36.8 - 74.3 ] Pulp canal obliteration 12 > 44.4 not available Ankylosis 7 25.9 [ 9.4 - 42.5 ] Inflammatory root resorption 8 29.6 [ 12.4 - 46.9 ] Surface resorption 0 0 not available Bone loss 1 3.7 [ 0 - 10.8 ]
Dear colleague, our data base included 8 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 7 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Results, one year after the injury Number of diagnosed events Estimated risk (%) 95% confidence interval Tooth loss 0 0 [ 0 - 36.9 ] Pulp necrosis 2 37.5 [ 6.5 - 68.5 ] Pulp canal obliteration 3 50 [ 15.4 - 84.6 ] Ankylosis 0 0 [ 0 - 36.9 ] Inflammatory root resorption 0 12.5 [ 0 - 32.9 ] Surface resorption 0 0 [ 0 - 36.9 ] Bone loss 0 12.5 [ 0 - 32.9 ]
Results, three years after the injury Number of diagnosed events Estimated risk (%) 95% confidence interval Tooth loss 0 0 [ 0 - 36.9 ] Pulp necrosis 3 50 [ 19.6 - 80.4 ] Pulp canal obliteration 4 > 50 not available Ankylosis 0 0 [ 0 - 36.9 ] Inflammatory root resorption 0 12.5 [ 0 - 32.9 ] Surface resorption 0 0 [ 0 - 36.9 ] Bone loss 0 12.5 [ 0 - 32.9 ]
Results, ten years after the injury Number of diagnosed events Estimated risk (%) 95% confidence interval Tooth loss 0 0 [ 0 - 60.2 ] Pulp necrosis 4 50 [ 19.6 - 80.4 ] Pulp canal obliteration 4 > 50 not available Ankylosis 0 0 [ 0 - 60.2 ] Inflammatory root resorption 1 12.5 [ 0 - 32.9 ] Surface resorption 0 0 [ 0 - 60.2 ] Bone loss 1 12.5 [ 0 - 32.9 ]
Dear colleague, our data base included 19 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 16 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Results, one year after the injury Number of diagnosed events Estimated risk (%) 95% confidence interval Tooth loss 0 0 not available Pulp necrosis 10 57.9 [ 35.7 - 80.1 ] Pulp canal obliteration 6 36.8 [ 15.2 - 58.5 ] Ankylosis 5 31.6 [ 10.7 - 52.5 ] Inflammatory root resorption 6 36.8 [ 15.2 - 58.5 ] Surface resorption 0 0 not available Bone loss 0 0 not available
Results, three years after the injury Number of diagnosed events Estimated risk (%) 95% confidence interval Tooth loss 2 11.6 [ 0 - 26 ] Pulp necrosis 11 57.9 [ 35.7 - 80.1 ] Pulp canal obliteration 8 > 42.1 not available Ankylosis 7 36.8 [ 15.2 - 58.5 ] Inflammatory root resorption 7 36.8 [ 15.2 - 58.5 ] Surface resorption 0 0 not available Bone loss 0 0 not available
Results, ten years after the injury Number of diagnosed events Estimated risk (%) 95% confidence interval Tooth loss 4 40.1 [ 13.5 - 66.8 ] Pulp necrosis 11 57.9 [ 35.7 - 80.1 ] Pulp canal obliteration 8 > 42.1 not available Ankylosis 7 36.8 [ 15.2 - 58.5 ] Inflammatory root resorption 7 36.8 [ 15.2 - 58.5 ] Surface resorption 0 0 not available Bone loss 0 0 not available
Dear colleague, our data base included 74 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 62 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Results, one year after the injury Number of diagnosed events Estimated risk (%) 95% confidence interval Tooth loss 2 2.7 [ 0 - 6.3 ] Pulp necrosis 52 74.3 [ 64.4 - 84.3 ] Pulp canal obliteration 16 23 [ 13.4 - 32.6 ] Ankylosis 28 37.8 [ 26.8 - 48.9 ] Inflammatory root resorption 27 36.5 [ 25.5 - 47.5 ] Surface resorption 2 2.7 [ 0 - 6.4 ] Bone loss 3 4.1 [ 0 - 8.5 ]
Results, three years after the injury Number of diagnosed events Estimated risk (%) 95% confidence interval Tooth loss 16 24.7 [ 14 - 35.4 ] Pulp necrosis 55 74.3 [ 64.4 - 84.3 ] Pulp canal obliteration 17 24.3 [ 14.5 - 34.1 ] Ankylosis 32 44.4 [ 32.8 - 56.1 ] Inflammatory root resorption 29 39.4 [ 28.2 - 50.6 ] Surface resorption 2 2.7 [ 0 - 6.4 ] Bone loss 3 4.1 [ 0 - 8.5 ]
Results, ten years after the injury Number of diagnosed events Estimated risk (%) 95% confidence interval Tooth loss 28 49.3 [ 35.4 - 63.3 ] Pulp necrosis 55 74.3 [ 64.4 - 84.3 ] Pulp canal obliteration 19 > 25.7 not available Ankylosis 33 46.3 [ 34.5 - 58.1 ] Inflammatory root resorption 30 41 [ 29.7 - 52.4 ] Surface resorption 3 4.4 [ 0 - 9.4 ] Bone loss 3 4.1 [ 0 - 8.5 ]
Dear colleague, our data base included 23 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 20 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Results, one year after the injury Number of diagnosed events Estimated risk (%) 95% confidence interval Tooth loss 0 4.3 [ 0 - 12.4 ] Pulp necrosis 12 56.5 [ 36.3 - 76.8 ] Pulp canal obliteration 8 39.1 [ 19.2 - 59.1 ] Ankylosis 8 43.5 [ 25.7 - 61.3 ] Inflammatory root resorption 8 34.8 [ 15.3 - 54.2 ] Surface resorption 0 0 [ 0 - 0 ] Bone loss 0 0 not available
Results, three years after the injury Number of diagnosed events Estimated risk (%) 95% confidence interval Tooth loss 3 20.2 [ 4 - 36.4 ] Pulp necrosis 13 56.5 [ 36.3 - 76.8 ] Pulp canal obliteration 10 > 43.5 not available Ankylosis 10 43.5 [ 25.7 - 61.3 ] Inflammatory root resorption 8 34.8 [ 15.3 - 54.2 ] Surface resorption 0 0 [ 0 - 0 ] Bone loss 0 0 not available
Results, ten years after the injury Number of diagnosed events Estimated risk (%) 95% confidence interval Tooth loss 6 33 [ 13.1 - 53 ] Pulp necrosis 13 56.5 [ 36.3 - 76.8 ] Pulp canal obliteration 10 > 43.5 not available Ankylosis 10 43.5 [ 25.7 - 61.3 ] Inflammatory root resorption 8 34.8 [ 15.3 - 54.2 ] Surface resorption 1 6.1 [ 0 - 17.8 ] Bone loss 0 0 not available
Dear colleague, our data base included 51 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 43 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Results, one year after the injury Number of diagnosed events Estimated risk (%) 95% confidence interval Tooth loss 1 2 [ 0 - 5.6 ] Pulp necrosis 40 82.4 [ 71.9 - 92.8 ] Pulp canal obliteration 7 15.7 [ 5.7 - 25.7 ] Ankylosis 18 35.3 [ 22.2 - 48.4 ] Inflammatory root resorption 19 37.3 [ 24 - 50.5 ] Surface resorption 2 3.9 [ 0 - 9.2 ] Bone loss 3 5.9 [ 0 - 12.3 ]
Results, three years after the injury Number of diagnosed events Estimated risk (%) 95% confidence interval Tooth loss 12 26.1 [ 13.1 - 39 ] Pulp necrosis 42 82.4 [ 71.9 - 92.8 ] Pulp canal obliteration 7 15.7 [ 5.7 - 25.7 ] Ankylosis 22 44.5 [ 30.5 - 58.6 ] Inflammatory root resorption 21 41.5 [ 27.9 - 55.1 ] Surface resorption 2 3.9 [ 0 - 9.2 ] Bone loss 3 5.9 [ 0 - 12.3 ]
Results, ten years after the injury Number of diagnosed events Estimated risk (%) 95% confidence interval Tooth loss 22 54 [ 38 - 70 ] Pulp necrosis 42 82.4 [ 71.9 - 92.8 ] Pulp canal obliteration 9 > 17.6 not available Ankylosis 23 47.1 [ 32.9 - 61.4 ] Inflammatory root resorption 22 43.9 [ 30.1 - 57.8 ] Surface resorption 2 3.9 [ 0 - 9.2 ] Bone loss 3 5.9 [ 0 - 12.3 ]
Dear colleague, our data base included 9 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 9 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Results, one year after the injury Number of diagnosed events Estimated risk (%) 95% confidence interval Tooth loss 0 11.1 [ 0 - 29.4 ] Pulp necrosis 7 88.9 [ 68.4 - 100 ] Pulp canal obliteration 1 > 11.1 not available Ankylosis 5 66.7 [ 35.9 - 97.5 ] Inflammatory root resorption 2 33.3 [ 2.5 - 64.1 ] Surface resorption 0 0 not available Bone loss 0 0 not available
Results, three years after the injury Number of diagnosed events Estimated risk (%) 95% confidence interval Tooth loss 4 58.3 [ 31 - 85.7 ] Pulp necrosis 8 > 88.9 not available Pulp canal obliteration 1 > 11.1 not available Ankylosis 6 66.7 [ 35.9 - 97.5 ] Inflammatory root resorption 3 33.3 [ 2.5 - 64.1 ] Surface resorption 0 0 not available Bone loss 0 0 not available
Results, ten years after the injury Number of diagnosed events Estimated risk (%) 95% confidence interval Tooth loss 6 86.1 [ 70.9 - 100 ] Pulp necrosis 8 > 88.9 not available Pulp canal obliteration 1 > 11.1 not available Ankylosis 6 66.7 [ 35.9 - 97.5 ] Inflammatory root resorption 3 > 33.3 not available Surface resorption 0 0 not available Bone loss 0 0 not available
Dear colleague, our data base included 290 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 232 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Results, one year after the injury Number of diagnosed events Estimated risk (%) 95% confidence interval Tooth loss 3 1 [ 0 - 2.2 ] Pulp necrosis 0 0 not available Pulp canal obliteration 0 0 not available Ankylosis 183 63.1 [ 57.6 - 68.7 ] Inflammatory root resorption 58 20 [ 15.4 - 24.6 ] Surface resorption 10 3.4 [ 1.3 - 5.5 ] Bone loss 20 6.9 [ 4 - 9.8 ]
Results, three years after the injury Number of diagnosed events Estimated risk (%) 95% confidence interval Tooth loss 28 11.9 [ 7.2 - 16.5 ] Pulp necrosis 0 0 not available Pulp canal obliteration 0 0 not available Ankylosis 202 70.7 [ 65.4 - 76.1 ] Inflammatory root resorption 67 23.6 [ 18.7 - 28.6 ] Surface resorption 13 4.6 [ 2.2 - 7.1 ] Bone loss 23 8.2 [ 5 - 11.5 ]
Results, ten years after the injury Number of diagnosed events Estimated risk (%) 95% confidence interval Tooth loss 71 45.1 [ 35.4 - 54.8 ] Pulp necrosis 0 0 not available Pulp canal obliteration 0 0 not available Ankylosis 208 74.2 [ 68.7 - 79.6 ] Inflammatory root resorption 78 31.7 [ 25.3 - 38.2 ] Surface resorption 13 4.6 [ 2.2 - 7.1 ] Bone loss 25 9.9 [ 6 - 13.8 ]
Dear colleague, our data base included 66 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 53 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Results, one year after the injury Number of diagnosed events Estimated risk (%) 95% confidence interval Tooth loss 1 1.5 [ 0 - 4.4 ] Pulp necrosis 0 0 not available Pulp canal obliteration 0 0 not available Ankylosis 28 42.4 [ 30.5 - 54.3 ] Inflammatory root resorption 7 10.6 [ 3.2 - 18 ] Surface resorption 2 3 [ 0 - 7.2 ] Bone loss 3 4.5 [ 0 - 9.6 ]
Results, three years after the injury Number of diagnosed events Estimated risk (%) 95% confidence interval Tooth loss 3 5.5 [ 0 - 11.6 ] Pulp necrosis 0 0 not available Pulp canal obliteration 0 0 not available Ankylosis 31 47.5 [ 35.3 - 59.7 ] Inflammatory root resorption 7 10.6 [ 3.2 - 18 ] Surface resorption 4 6.4 [ 0.3 - 12.4 ] Bone loss 3 4.5 [ 0 - 9.6 ]
Results, ten years after the injury Number of diagnosed events Estimated risk (%) 95% confidence interval Tooth loss 7 21.5 [ 6.5 - 36.5 ] Pulp necrosis 0 0 not available Pulp canal obliteration 0 0 not available Ankylosis 32 50.1 [ 37.5 - 62.7 ] Inflammatory root resorption 9 22.2 [ 5.9 - 38.4 ] Surface resorption 4 6.4 [ 0.3 - 12.4 ] Bone loss 3 4.5 [ 0 - 9.6 ]
Dear colleague, our data base included 18 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 14 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Results, one year after the injury Number of diagnosed events Estimated risk (%) 95% confidence interval Tooth loss 0 0 [ 0 - 19.5 ] Pulp necrosis 0 0 not available Pulp canal obliteration 0 0 not available Ankylosis 2 11.1 [ 0 - 23.6 ] Inflammatory root resorption 1 5.6 [ 0 - 15.7 ] Surface resorption 0 0 [ 0 - 19.5 ] Bone loss 0 0 [ 0 - 19.5 ]
Results, three years after the injury Number of diagnosed events Estimated risk (%) 95% confidence interval Tooth loss 0 0 [ 0 - 24.7 ] Pulp necrosis 0 0 not available Pulp canal obliteration 0 0 not available Ankylosis 2 11.1 [ 0 - 23.6 ] Inflammatory root resorption 1 5.6 [ 0 - 15.7 ] Surface resorption 0 0 [ 0 - 24.7 ] Bone loss 0 0 [ 0 - 24.7 ]
Results, ten years after the injury Number of diagnosed events Estimated risk (%) 95% confidence interval Tooth loss 0 0 [ 0 - 84.2 ] Pulp necrosis 0 0 not available Pulp canal obliteration 0 0 not available Ankylosis 2 11.1 [ 0 - 23.6 ] Inflammatory root resorption 1 5.6 [ 0 - 15.7 ] Surface resorption 0 0 [ 0 - 84.2 ] Bone loss 0 0 [ 0 - 84.2 ]
Dear colleague, our data base included 48 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 39 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Results, one year after the injury Number of diagnosed events Estimated risk (%) 95% confidence interval Tooth loss 0 2.1 [ 0 - 6.1 ] Pulp necrosis 0 0 not available Pulp canal obliteration 0 0 not available Ankylosis 25 54.2 [ 40.1 - 68.3 ] Inflammatory root resorption 5 12.5 [ 3.1 - 21.9 ] Surface resorption 1 4.2 [ 0 - 9.8 ] Bone loss 1 6.2 [ 0 - 13.1 ]
Results, three years after the injury Number of diagnosed events Estimated risk (%) 95% confidence interval Tooth loss 3 7.5 [ 0 - 15.7 ] Pulp necrosis 0 0 not available Pulp canal obliteration 0 0 not available Ankylosis 29 60.9 [ 46.9 - 74.8 ] Inflammatory root resorption 6 12.5 [ 3.1 - 21.9 ] Surface resorption 4 8.7 [ 0.5 - 16.9 ] Bone loss 3 6.2 [ 0 - 13.1 ]
Results, ten years after the injury Number of diagnosed events Estimated risk (%) 95% confidence interval Tooth loss 7 26.4 [ 9.4 - 43.3 ] Pulp necrosis 0 0 not available Pulp canal obliteration 0 0 not available Ankylosis 30 63.9 [ 49.8 - 77.9 ] Inflammatory root resorption 8 25.2 [ 7.2 - 43.1 ] Surface resorption 4 8.7 [ 0.5 - 16.9 ] Bone loss 3 6.2 [ 0 - 13.1 ]
Dear colleague, our data base included 182 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 146 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Results, one year after the injury Number of diagnosed events Estimated risk (%) 95% confidence interval Tooth loss 2 1.1 [ 0 - 2.6 ] Pulp necrosis 0 0 not available Pulp canal obliteration 0 0 not available Ankylosis 122 68.2 [ 61.4 - 75 ] Inflammatory root resorption 38 20.9 [ 15 - 26.8 ] Surface resorption 7 3.8 [ 1.1 - 6.6 ] Bone loss 13 7.1 [ 3.4 - 10.9 ]
Results, three years after the injury Number of diagnosed events Estimated risk (%) 95% confidence interval Tooth loss 20 13.9 [ 7.3 - 20.4 ] Pulp necrosis 0 0 not available Pulp canal obliteration 0 0 not available Ankylosis 135 75.3 [ 68.9 - 81.8 ] Inflammatory root resorption 45 25.6 [ 19.1 - 32.1 ] Surface resorption 8 4.5 [ 1.4 - 7.6 ] Bone loss 16 9.3 [ 4.9 - 13.8 ]
Results, ten years after the injury Number of diagnosed events Estimated risk (%) 95% confidence interval Tooth loss 46 44.3 [ 32.6 - 56 ] Pulp necrosis 0 0 not available Pulp canal obliteration 0 0 not available Ankylosis 139 79 [ 72.5 - 85.4 ] Inflammatory root resorption 53 34.3 [ 26.2 - 42.5 ] Surface resorption 8 4.5 [ 1.4 - 7.6 ] Bone loss 18 11.8 [ 6.4 - 17.2 ]
Dear colleague, our data base included 77 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 66 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Results, one year after the injury Number of diagnosed events Estimated risk (%) 95% confidence interval Tooth loss 0 0 not available Pulp necrosis 0 0 not available Pulp canal obliteration 0 0 not available Ankylosis 48 63.6 [ 52.9 - 74.4 ] Inflammatory root resorption 9 11.7 [ 4.5 - 18.9 ] Surface resorption 5 6.5 [ 1 - 12 ] Bone loss 4 5.2 [ 0.2 - 10.2 ]
Results, three years after the injury Number of diagnosed events Estimated risk (%) 95% confidence interval Tooth loss 9 16 [ 5.5 - 26.5 ] Pulp necrosis 0 0 not available Pulp canal obliteration 0 0 not available Ankylosis 55 72.9 [ 62.6 - 83.2 ] Inflammatory root resorption 12 16.4 [ 7.9 - 25 ] Surface resorption 6 8.2 [ 1.9 - 14.5 ] Bone loss 7 10.8 [ 3.1 - 18.6 ]
Results, ten years after the injury Number of diagnosed events Estimated risk (%) 95% confidence interval Tooth loss 16 36.1 [ 21.3 - 50.9 ] Pulp necrosis 0 0 not available Pulp canal obliteration 0 0 not available Ankylosis 55 72.9 [ 62.6 - 83.2 ] Inflammatory root resorption 16 25.8 [ 14.3 - 37.3 ] Surface resorption 6 8.2 [ 1.9 - 14.5 ] Bone loss 8 13.5 [ 4.4 - 22.7 ]
Dear colleague, our data base included 105 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 82 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Results, one year after the injury Number of diagnosed events Estimated risk (%) 95% confidence interval Tooth loss 2 1.9 [ 0 - 4.5 ] Pulp necrosis 0 0 not available Pulp canal obliteration 0 0 not available Ankylosis 73 71.6 [ 62.9 - 80.2 ] Inflammatory root resorption 29 27.6 [ 19.1 - 36.2 ] Surface resorption 2 1.9 [ 0 - 4.5 ] Bone loss 9 8.6 [ 3.2 - 13.9 ]
Results, three years after the injury Number of diagnosed events Estimated risk (%) 95% confidence interval Tooth loss 11 12.3 [ 4.3 - 20.4 ] Pulp necrosis 0 0 not available Pulp canal obliteration 0 0 not available Ankylosis 80 77.2 [ 69 - 85.5 ] Inflammatory root resorption 33 32.3 [ 23.2 - 41.5 ] Surface resorption 2 1.9 [ 0 - 4.5 ] Bone loss 9 8.6 [ 3.2 - 13.9 ]
Results, ten years after the injury Number of diagnosed events Estimated risk (%) 95% confidence interval Tooth loss 30 50.3 [ 33.7 - 66.9 ] Pulp necrosis 0 0 not available Pulp canal obliteration 0 0 not available Ankylosis 84 84.4 [ 76.2 - 92.6 ] Inflammatory root resorption 37 41.5 [ 29.8 - 53.3 ] Surface resorption 2 1.9 [ 0 - 4.5 ] Bone loss 10 10.8 [ 4 - 17.6 ]
Dear colleague, our data base included 42 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 35 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Results, one year after the injury Number of diagnosed events Estimated risk (%) 95% confidence interval Tooth loss 0 0 not available Pulp necrosis 0 0 not available Pulp canal obliteration 0 0 not available Ankylosis 30 73.8 [ 60.5 - 87.1 ] Inflammatory root resorption 12 31 [ 17 - 44.9 ] Surface resorption 0 2.4 [ 0 - 7 ] Bone loss 3 9.5 [ 0.6 - 18.4 ]
Results, three years after the injury Number of diagnosed events Estimated risk (%) 95% confidence interval Tooth loss 5 13.1 [ 2.7 - 23.6 ] Pulp necrosis 0 0 not available Pulp canal obliteration 0 0 not available Ankylosis 35 86.9 [ 76.4 - 97.4 ] Inflammatory root resorption 15 35.9 [ 21.3 - 50.4 ] Surface resorption 1 2.4 [ 0 - 7 ] Bone loss 4 9.5 [ 0.6 - 18.4 ]
Results, ten years after the injury Number of diagnosed events Estimated risk (%) 95% confidence interval Tooth loss 18 70.1 [ 52.6 - 87.6 ] Pulp necrosis 0 0 not available Pulp canal obliteration 0 0 not available Ankylosis 37 89.5 [ 80 - 99.1 ] Inflammatory root resorption 16 39.7 [ 24.2 - 55.1 ] Surface resorption 1 2.4 [ 0 - 7 ] Bone loss 4 9.5 [ 0.6 - 18.4 ]
Dear colleague, our data base included 290 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 232 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Results, one year after the injury Number of diagnosed events Estimated risk (%) 95% confidence interval Tooth loss 3 1 [ 0 - 2.2 ] Pulp necrosis 0 0 not available Pulp canal obliteration 0 0 not available Ankylosis 183 63.1 [ 57.6 - 68.7 ] Inflammatory root resorption 58 20 [ 15.4 - 24.6 ] Surface resorption 10 3.4 [ 1.3 - 5.5 ] Bone loss 20 6.9 [ 4 - 9.8 ]
Results, three years after the injury Number of diagnosed events Estimated risk (%) 95% confidence interval Tooth loss 28 11.9 [ 7.2 - 16.5 ] Pulp necrosis 0 0 not available Pulp canal obliteration 0 0 not available Ankylosis 202 70.7 [ 65.4 - 76.1 ] Inflammatory root resorption 67 23.6 [ 18.7 - 28.6 ] Surface resorption 13 4.6 [ 2.2 - 7.1 ] Bone loss 23 8.2 [ 5 - 11.5 ]
Results, ten years after the injury Number of diagnosed events Estimated risk (%) 95% confidence interval Tooth loss 71 45.1 [ 35.4 - 54.8 ] Pulp necrosis 0 0 not available Pulp canal obliteration 0 0 not available Ankylosis 208 74.2 [ 68.7 - 79.6 ] Inflammatory root resorption 78 31.7 [ 25.3 - 38.2 ] Surface resorption 13 4.6 [ 2.2 - 7.1 ] Bone loss 25 9.9 [ 6 - 13.8 ]
Dear colleague, our data base included 66 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 53 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Results, one year after the injury Number of diagnosed events Estimated risk (%) 95% confidence interval Tooth loss 1 1.5 [ 0 - 4.4 ] Pulp necrosis 0 0 not available Pulp canal obliteration 0 0 not available Ankylosis 28 42.4 [ 30.5 - 54.3 ] Inflammatory root resorption 7 10.6 [ 3.2 - 18 ] Surface resorption 2 3 [ 0 - 7.2 ] Bone loss 3 4.5 [ 0 - 9.6 ]
Results, three years after the injury Number of diagnosed events Estimated risk (%) 95% confidence interval Tooth loss 3 5.5 [ 0 - 11.6 ] Pulp necrosis 0 0 not available Pulp canal obliteration 0 0 not available Ankylosis 31 47.5 [ 35.3 - 59.7 ] Inflammatory root resorption 7 10.6 [ 3.2 - 18 ] Surface resorption 4 6.4 [ 0.3 - 12.4 ] Bone loss 3 4.5 [ 0 - 9.6 ]
Results, ten years after the injury Number of diagnosed events Estimated risk (%) 95% confidence interval Tooth loss 7 21.5 [ 6.5 - 36.5 ] Pulp necrosis 0 0 not available Pulp canal obliteration 0 0 not available Ankylosis 32 50.1 [ 37.5 - 62.7 ] Inflammatory root resorption 9 22.2 [ 5.9 - 38.4 ] Surface resorption 4 6.4 [ 0.3 - 12.4 ] Bone loss 3 4.5 [ 0 - 9.6 ]
Dear colleague, our data base included 18 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 14 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Results, one year after the injury Number of diagnosed events Estimated risk (%) 95% confidence interval Tooth loss 0 0 [ 0 - 19.5 ] Pulp necrosis 0 0 not available Pulp canal obliteration 0 0 not available Ankylosis 2 11.1 [ 0 - 23.6 ] Inflammatory root resorption 1 5.6 [ 0 - 15.7 ] Surface resorption 0 0 [ 0 - 19.5 ] Bone loss 0 0 [ 0 - 19.5 ]
Results, three years after the injury Number of diagnosed events Estimated risk (%) 95% confidence interval Tooth loss 0 0 [ 0 - 24.7 ] Pulp necrosis 0 0 not available Pulp canal obliteration 0 0 not available Ankylosis 2 11.1 [ 0 - 23.6 ] Inflammatory root resorption 1 5.6 [ 0 - 15.7 ] Surface resorption 0 0 [ 0 - 24.7 ] Bone loss 0 0 [ 0 - 24.7 ]
Results, ten years after the injury Number of diagnosed events Estimated risk (%) 95% confidence interval Tooth loss 0 0 [ 0 - 84.2 ] Pulp necrosis 0 0 not available Pulp canal obliteration 0 0 not available Ankylosis 2 11.1 [ 0 - 23.6 ] Inflammatory root resorption 1 5.6 [ 0 - 15.7 ] Surface resorption 0 0 [ 0 - 84.2 ] Bone loss 0 0 [ 0 - 84.2 ]
Dear colleague, our data base included 48 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 39 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Results, one year after the injury Number of diagnosed events Estimated risk (%) 95% confidence interval Tooth loss 0 2.1 [ 0 - 6.1 ] Pulp necrosis 0 0 not available Pulp canal obliteration 0 0 not available Ankylosis 25 54.2 [ 40.1 - 68.3 ] Inflammatory root resorption 5 12.5 [ 3.1 - 21.9 ] Surface resorption 1 4.2 [ 0 - 9.8 ] Bone loss 1 6.2 [ 0 - 13.1 ]
Results, three years after the injury Number of diagnosed events Estimated risk (%) 95% confidence interval Tooth loss 3 7.5 [ 0 - 15.7 ] Pulp necrosis 0 0 not available Pulp canal obliteration 0 0 not available Ankylosis 29 60.9 [ 46.9 - 74.8 ] Inflammatory root resorption 6 12.5 [ 3.1 - 21.9 ] Surface resorption 4 8.7 [ 0.5 - 16.9 ] Bone loss 3 6.2 [ 0 - 13.1 ]
Results, ten years after the injury Number of diagnosed events Estimated risk (%) 95% confidence interval Tooth loss 7 26.4 [ 9.4 - 43.3 ] Pulp necrosis 0 0 not available Pulp canal obliteration 0 0 not available Ankylosis 30 63.9 [ 49.8 - 77.9 ] Inflammatory root resorption 8 25.2 [ 7.2 - 43.1 ] Surface resorption 4 8.7 [ 0.5 - 16.9 ] Bone loss 3 6.2 [ 0 - 13.1 ]
Dear colleague, our data base included 182 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 146 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Results, one year after the injury Number of diagnosed events Estimated risk (%) 95% confidence interval Tooth loss 2 1.1 [ 0 - 2.6 ] Pulp necrosis 0 0 not available Pulp canal obliteration 0 0 not available Ankylosis 122 68.2 [ 61.4 - 75 ] Inflammatory root resorption 38 20.9 [ 15 - 26.8 ] Surface resorption 7 3.8 [ 1.1 - 6.6 ] Bone loss 13 7.1 [ 3.4 - 10.9 ]
Results, three years after the injury Number of diagnosed events Estimated risk (%) 95% confidence interval Tooth loss 20 13.9 [ 7.3 - 20.4 ] Pulp necrosis 0 0 not available Pulp canal obliteration 0 0 not available Ankylosis 135 75.3 [ 68.9 - 81.8 ] Inflammatory root resorption 45 25.6 [ 19.1 - 32.1 ] Surface resorption 8 4.5 [ 1.4 - 7.6 ] Bone loss 16 9.3 [ 4.9 - 13.8 ]
Results, ten years after the injury Number of diagnosed events Estimated risk (%) 95% confidence interval Tooth loss 46 44.3 [ 32.6 - 56 ] Pulp necrosis 0 0 not available Pulp canal obliteration 0 0 not available Ankylosis 139 79 [ 72.5 - 85.4 ] Inflammatory root resorption 53 34.3 [ 26.2 - 42.5 ] Surface resorption 8 4.5 [ 1.4 - 7.6 ] Bone loss 18 11.8 [ 6.4 - 17.2 ]
Dear colleague, our data base included 77 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 66 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Results, one year after the injury Number of diagnosed events Estimated risk (%) 95% confidence interval Tooth loss 0 0 not available Pulp necrosis 0 0 not available Pulp canal obliteration 0 0 not available Ankylosis 48 63.6 [ 52.9 - 74.4 ] Inflammatory root resorption 9 11.7 [ 4.5 - 18.9 ] Surface resorption 5 6.5 [ 1 - 12 ] Bone loss 4 5.2 [ 0.2 - 10.2 ]
Results, three years after the injury Number of diagnosed events Estimated risk (%) 95% confidence interval Tooth loss 11 12.3 [ 4.3 - 20.4 ] Pulp necrosis 0 0 not available Pulp canal obliteration 0 0 not available Ankylosis 80 77.2 [ 69 - 85.5 ] Inflammatory root resorption 33 32.3 [ 23.2 - 41.5 ] Surface resorption 2 1.9 [ 0 - 4.5 ] Bone loss 9 8.6 [ 3.2 - 13.9 ]
Results, ten years after the injury Number of diagnosed events Estimated risk (%) 95% confidence interval Tooth loss 30 50.3 [ 33.7 - 66.9 ] Pulp necrosis 0 0 not available Pulp canal obliteration 0 0 not available Ankylosis 84 84.4 [ 76.2 - 92.6 ] Inflammatory root resorption 37 41.5 [ 29.8 - 53.3 ] Surface resorption 2 1.9 [ 0 - 4.5 ] Bone loss 10 10.8 [ 4 - 17.6 ]
Dear colleague, our data base included 77 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 66 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Results, one year after the injury Number of diagnosed events Estimated risk (%) 95% confidence interval Tooth loss 0 0 not available Pulp necrosis 0 0 not available Pulp canal obliteration 0 0 not available Ankylosis 48 63.6 [ 52.9 - 74.4 ] Inflammatory root resorption 9 11.7 [ 4.5 - 18.9 ] Surface resorption 5 6.5 [ 1 - 12 ] Bone loss 4 5.2 [ 0.2 - 10.2 ]
Results, three years after the injury Number of diagnosed events Estimated risk (%) 95% confidence interval Tooth loss 11 12.3 [ 4.3 - 20.4 ] Pulp necrosis 0 0 not available Pulp canal obliteration 0 0 not available Ankylosis 80 77.2 [ 69 - 85.5 ] Inflammatory root resorption 33 32.3 [ 23.2 - 41.5 ] Surface resorption 2 1.9 [ 0 - 4.5 ] Bone loss 9 8.6 [ 3.2 - 13.9 ]
Results, ten years after the injury Number of diagnosed events Estimated risk (%) 95% confidence interval Tooth loss 30 50.3 [ 33.7 - 66.9 ] Pulp necrosis 0 0 not available Pulp canal obliteration 0 0 not available Ankylosis 84 84.4 [ 76.2 - 92.6 ] Inflammatory root resorption 37 41.5 [ 29.8 - 53.3 ] Surface resorption 2 1.9 [ 0 - 4.5 ] Bone loss 10 10.8 [ 4 - 17.6 ]
Dear colleague, our data base included 105 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 82 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Results, one year after the injury Number of diagnosed events Estimated risk (%) 95% confidence interval Tooth loss 2 1.9 [ 0 - 4.5 ] Pulp necrosis 0 0 not available Pulp canal obliteration 0 0 not available Ankylosis 73 71.6 [ 62.9 - 80.2 ] Inflammatory root resorption 29 27.6 [ 19.1 - 36.2 ] Surface resorption 2 1.9 [ 0 - 4.5 ] Bone loss 9 8.6 [ 3.2 - 13.9 ]
Results, three years after the injury Number of diagnosed events Estimated risk (%) 95% confidence interval Tooth loss 9 16 [ 5.5 - 26.5 ] Pulp necrosis 0 0 not available Pulp canal obliteration 0 0 not available Ankylosis 55 72.9 [ 62.6 - 83.2 ] Inflammatory root resorption 12 16.4 [ 7.9 - 25 ] Surface resorption 6 8.2 [ 1.9 - 14.5 ] Bone loss 7 10.8 [ 3.1 - 18.6 ]
Results, ten years after the injury Number of diagnosed events Estimated risk (%) 95% confidence interval Tooth loss 16 36.1 [ 21.3 - 50.9 ] Pulp necrosis 0 0 not available Pulp canal obliteration 0 0 not available Ankylosis 55 72.9 [ 62.6 - 83.2 ] Inflammatory root resorption 16 25.8 [ 14.3 - 37.3 ] Surface resorption 6 8.2 [ 1.9 - 14.5 ] Bone loss 8 13.5 [ 4.4 - 22.7 ]
Dear colleague, our data base included 42 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 35 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Results, one year after the injury Number of diagnosed events Estimated risk (%) 95% confidence interval Tooth loss 0 0 not available Pulp necrosis 0 0 not available Pulp canal obliteration 0 0 not available Ankylosis 30 73.8 [ 60.5 - 87.1 ] Inflammatory root resorption 12 31 [ 17 - 44.9 ] Surface resorption 0 2.4 [ 0 - 7 ] Bone loss 3 9.5 [ 0.6 - 18.4 ]
Results, three years after the injury Number of diagnosed events Estimated risk (%) 95% confidence interval Tooth loss 5 13.1 [ 2.7 - 23.6 ] Pulp necrosis 0 0 not available Pulp canal obliteration 0 0 not available Ankylosis 35 86.9 [ 76.4 - 97.4 ] Inflammatory root resorption 15 35.9 [ 21.3 - 50.4 ] Surface resorption 1 2.4 [ 0 - 7 ] Bone loss 4 9.5 [ 0.6 - 18.4 ]
Results, ten years after the injury Number of diagnosed events Estimated risk (%) 95% confidence interval Tooth loss 18 70.1 [ 52.6 - 87.6 ] Pulp necrosis 0 0 not available Pulp canal obliteration 0 0 not available Ankylosis 37 89.5 [ 80 - 99.1 ] Inflammatory root resorption 16 39.7 [ 24.2 - 55.1 ] Surface resorption 1 2.4 [ 0 - 7 ] Bone loss 4 9.5 [ 0.6 - 18.4 ]
Dear colleague, our data base included 290 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 232 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Results, one year after the injury Number of diagnosed events Estimated risk (%) 95% confidence interval Tooth loss 3 1 [ 0 - 2.2 ] Pulp necrosis 0 0 not available Pulp canal obliteration 0 0 not available Ankylosis 183 63.1 [ 57.6 - 68.7 ] Inflammatory root resorption 58 20 [ 15.4 - 24.6 ] Surface resorption 10 3.4 [ 1.3 - 5.5 ] Bone loss 20 6.9 [ 4 - 9.8 ]
Results, three years after the injury Number of diagnosed events Estimated risk (%) 95% confidence interval Tooth loss 28 11.9 [ 7.2 - 16.5 ] Pulp necrosis 0 0 not available Pulp canal obliteration 0 0 not available Ankylosis 202 70.7 [ 65.4 - 76.1 ] Inflammatory root resorption 67 23.6 [ 18.7 - 28.6 ] Surface resorption 13 4.6 [ 2.2 - 7.1 ] Bone loss 23 8.2 [ 5 - 11.5 ]
Results, ten years after the injury Number of diagnosed events Estimated risk (%) 95% confidence interval Tooth loss 71 45.1 [ 35.4 - 54.8 ] Pulp necrosis 0 0 not available Pulp canal obliteration 0 0 not available Ankylosis 208 74.2 [ 68.7 - 79.6 ] Inflammatory root resorption 78 31.7 [ 25.3 - 38.2 ] Surface resorption 13 4.6 [ 2.2 - 7.1 ] Bone loss 25 9.9 [ 6 - 13.8 ]
Dear colleague, our data base included 66 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 53 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Results, one year after the injury Number of diagnosed events Estimated risk (%) 95% confidence interval Tooth loss 1 1.5 [ 0 - 4.4 ] Pulp necrosis 0 0 not available Pulp canal obliteration 0 0 not available Ankylosis 28 42.4 [ 30.5 - 54.3 ] Inflammatory root resorption 7 10.6 [ 3.2 - 18 ] Surface resorption 2 3 [ 0 - 7.2 ] Bone loss 3 4.5 [ 0 - 9.6 ]
Results, three years after the injury Number of diagnosed events Estimated risk (%) 95% confidence interval Tooth loss 3 5.5 [ 0 - 11.6 ] Pulp necrosis 0 0 not available Pulp canal obliteration 0 0 not available Ankylosis 31 47.5 [ 35.3 - 59.7 ] Inflammatory root resorption 7 10.6 [ 3.2 - 18 ] Surface resorption 4 6.4 [ 0.3 - 12.4 ] Bone loss 3 4.5 [ 0 - 9.6 ]
Results, ten years after the injury Number of diagnosed events Estimated risk (%) 95% confidence interval Tooth loss 7 21.5 [ 6.5 - 36.5 ] Pulp necrosis 0 0 not available Pulp canal obliteration 0 0 not available Ankylosis 32 50.1 [ 37.5 - 62.7 ] Inflammatory root resorption 9 22.2 [ 5.9 - 38.4 ] Surface resorption 4 6.4 [ 0.3 - 12.4 ] Bone loss 3 4.5 [ 0 - 9.6 ]
Dear colleague, our data base included 18 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 14 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Results, one year after the injury Number of diagnosed events Estimated risk (%) 95% confidence interval Tooth loss 0 0 [ 0 - 19.5 ] Pulp necrosis 0 0 not available Pulp canal obliteration 0 0 not available Ankylosis 2 11.1 [ 0 - 23.6 ] Inflammatory root resorption 1 5.6 [ 0 - 15.7 ] Surface resorption 0 0 [ 0 - 19.5 ] Bone loss 0 0 [ 0 - 19.5 ]
Results, three years after the injury Number of diagnosed events Estimated risk (%) 95% confidence interval Tooth loss 0 0 [ 0 - 24.7 ] Pulp necrosis 0 0 not available Pulp canal obliteration 0 0 not available Ankylosis 2 11.1 [ 0 - 23.6 ] Inflammatory root resorption 1 5.6 [ 0 - 15.7 ] Surface resorption 0 0 [ 0 - 24.7 ] Bone loss 0 0 [ 0 - 24.7 ]
Results, ten years after the injury Number of diagnosed events Estimated risk (%) 95% confidence interval Tooth loss 0 0 [ 0 - 84.2 ] Pulp necrosis 0 0 not available Pulp canal obliteration 0 0 not available Ankylosis 2 11.1 [ 0 - 23.6 ] Inflammatory root resorption 1 5.6 [ 0 - 15.7 ] Surface resorption 0 0 [ 0 - 84.2 ] Bone loss 0 0 [ 0 - 84.2 ]
Dear colleague, our data base included 48 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 39 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Results, one year after the injury Number of diagnosed events Estimated risk (%) 95% confidence interval Tooth loss 0 2.1 [ 0 - 6.1 ] Pulp necrosis 0 0 not available Pulp canal obliteration 0 0 not available Ankylosis 25 54.2 [ 40.1 - 68.3 ] Inflammatory root resorption 5 12.5 [ 3.1 - 21.9 ] Surface resorption 1 4.2 [ 0 - 9.8 ] Bone loss 1 6.2 [ 0 - 13.1 ]
Results, three years after the injury Number of diagnosed events Estimated risk (%) 95% confidence interval Tooth loss 3 7.5 [ 0 - 15.7 ] Pulp necrosis 0 0 not available Pulp canal obliteration 0 0 not available Ankylosis 29 60.9 [ 46.9 - 74.8 ] Inflammatory root resorption 6 12.5 [ 3.1 - 21.9 ] Surface resorption 4 8.7 [ 0.5 - 16.9 ] Bone loss 3 6.2 [ 0 - 13.1 ]
Results, ten years after the injury Number of diagnosed events Estimated risk (%) 95% confidence interval Tooth loss 7 26.4 [ 9.4 - 43.3 ] Pulp necrosis 0 0 not available Pulp canal obliteration 0 0 not available Ankylosis 30 63.9 [ 49.8 - 77.9 ] Inflammatory root resorption 8 25.2 [ 7.2 - 43.1 ] Surface resorption 4 8.7 [ 0.5 - 16.9 ] Bone loss 3 6.2 [ 0 - 13.1 ]
Dear colleague, our data base included 182 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 146 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Results, one year after the injury Number of diagnosed events Estimated risk (%) 95% confidence interval Tooth loss 2 1.1 [ 0 - 2.6 ] Pulp necrosis 0 0 not available Pulp canal obliteration 0 0 not available Ankylosis 122 68.2 [ 61.4 - 75 ] Inflammatory root resorption 38 20.9 [ 15 - 26.8 ] Surface resorption 7 3.8 [ 1.1 - 6.6 ] Bone loss 13 7.1 [ 3.4 - 10.9 ]
Results, three years after the injury Number of diagnosed events Estimated risk (%) 95% confidence interval Tooth loss 20 13.9 [ 7.3 - 20.4 ] Pulp necrosis 0 0 not available Pulp canal obliteration 0 0 not available Ankylosis 135 75.3 [ 68.9 - 81.8 ] Inflammatory root resorption 45 25.6 [ 19.1 - 32.1 ] Surface resorption 8 4.5 [ 1.4 - 7.6 ] Bone loss 16 9.3 [ 4.9 - 13.8 ]
Results, ten years after the injury Number of diagnosed events Estimated risk (%) 95% confidence interval Tooth loss 46 44.3 [ 32.6 - 56 ] Pulp necrosis 0 0 not available Pulp canal obliteration 0 0 not available Ankylosis 139 79 [ 72.5 - 85.4 ] Inflammatory root resorption 53 34.3 [ 26.2 - 42.5 ] Surface resorption 8 4.5 [ 1.4 - 7.6 ] Bone loss 18 11.8 [ 6.4 - 17.2 ]
Dear colleague, our data base included 77 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 66 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Results, one year after the injury Number of diagnosed events Estimated risk (%) 95% confidence interval Tooth loss 0 0 not available Pulp necrosis 0 0 not available Pulp canal obliteration 0 0 not available Ankylosis 48 63.6 [ 52.9 - 74.4 ] Inflammatory root resorption 9 11.7 [ 4.5 - 18.9 ] Surface resorption 5 6.5 [ 1 - 12 ] Bone loss 4 5.2 [ 0.2 - 10.2 ]
Results, three years after the injury Number of diagnosed events Estimated risk (%) 95% confidence interval Tooth loss 9 16 [ 5.5 - 26.5 ] Pulp necrosis 0 0 not available Pulp canal obliteration 0 0 not available Ankylosis 55 72.9 [ 62.6 - 83.2 ] Inflammatory root resorption 12 16.4 [ 7.9 - 25 ] Surface resorption 6 8.2 [ 1.9 - 14.5 ] Bone loss 7 10.8 [ 3.1 - 18.6 ]
Results, ten years after the injury Number of diagnosed events Estimated risk (%) 95% confidence interval Tooth loss 16 36.1 [ 21.3 - 50.9 ] Pulp necrosis 0 0 not available Pulp canal obliteration 0 0 not available Ankylosis 55 72.9 [ 62.6 - 83.2 ] Inflammatory root resorption 16 25.8 [ 14.3 - 37.3 ] Surface resorption 6 8.2 [ 1.9 - 14.5 ] Bone loss 8 13.5 [ 4.4 - 22.7 ]
Dear colleague, our data base included 105 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 82 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Results, one year after the injury Number of diagnosed events Estimated risk (%) 95% confidence interval Tooth loss 2 1.9 [ 0 - 4.5 ] Pulp necrosis 0 0 not available Pulp canal obliteration 0 0 not available Ankylosis 73 71.6 [ 62.9 - 80.2 ] Inflammatory root resorption 29 27.6 [ 19.1 - 36.2 ] Surface resorption 2 1.9 [ 0 - 4.5 ] Bone loss 9 8.6 [ 3.2 - 13.9 ]
Results, three years after the injury Number of diagnosed events Estimated risk (%) 95% confidence interval Tooth loss 11 12.3 [ 4.3 - 20.4 ] Pulp necrosis 0 0 not available Pulp canal obliteration 0 0 not available Ankylosis 80 77.2 [ 69 - 85.5 ] Inflammatory root resorption 33 32.3 [ 23.2 - 41.5 ] Surface resorption 2 1.9 [ 0 - 4.5 ] Bone loss 9 8.6 [ 3.2 - 13.9 ]
Results, ten years after the injury Number of diagnosed events Estimated risk (%) 95% confidence interval Tooth loss 30 50.3 [ 33.7 - 66.9 ] Pulp necrosis 0 0 not available Pulp canal obliteration 0 0 not available Ankylosis 84 84.4 [ 76.2 - 92.6 ] Inflammatory root resorption 37 41.5 [ 29.8 - 53.3 ] Surface resorption 2 1.9 [ 0 - 4.5 ] Bone loss 10 10.8 [ 4 - 17.6 ]
Dear colleague, our data base included 42 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 35 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Results, one year after the injury Number of diagnosed events Estimated risk (%) 95% confidence interval Tooth loss 0 0 not available Pulp necrosis 0 0 not available Pulp canal obliteration 0 0 not available Ankylosis 30 73.8 [ 60.5 - 87.1 ] Inflammatory root resorption 12 31 [ 17 - 44.9 ] Surface resorption 0 2.4 [ 0 - 7 ] Bone loss 3 9.5 [ 0.6 - 18.4 ]
Results, three years after the injury Number of diagnosed events Estimated risk (%) 95% confidence interval Tooth loss 5 13.1 [ 2.7 - 23.6 ] Pulp necrosis 0 0 not available Pulp canal obliteration 0 0 not available Ankylosis 35 86.9 [ 76.4 - 97.4 ] Inflammatory root resorption 15 35.9 [ 21.3 - 50.4 ] Surface resorption 1 2.4 [ 0 - 7 ] Bone loss 4 9.5 [ 0.6 - 18.4 ]
Results, ten years after the injury Number of diagnosed events Estimated risk (%) 95% confidence interval Tooth loss 18 70.1 [ 52.6 - 87.6 ] Pulp necrosis 0 0 not available Pulp canal obliteration 0 0 not available Ankylosis 37 89.5 [ 80 - 99.1 ] Inflammatory root resorption 16 39.7 [ 24.2 - 55.1 ] Surface resorption 1 2.4 [ 0 - 7 ] Bone loss 4 9.5 [ 0.6 - 18.4 ]
Pulp Canal Obliteration (PCO plot) Dear colleague, our data base included 110 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 92 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 27 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 23 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 8 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 7 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 19 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 16 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 74 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 62 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 23 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 20 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 51 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 43 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 9 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 9 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 110 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 92 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 27 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 23 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 8 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 7 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 19 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 16 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 74 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 62 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 23 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 20 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 51 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 43 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 9 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 9 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 110 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 92 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 27 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 23 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 8 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 7 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 8 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 7 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 19 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 16 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 74 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 62 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 23 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 20 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 51 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 43 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 9 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 9 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 290 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 232 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 66 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 53 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 18 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 14 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 48 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 39 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 182 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 146 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 77 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 66 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 105 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 82 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 42 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 35 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 290 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 232 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 66 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 53 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 18 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 14 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 48 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 39 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 182 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 146 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 77 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 66 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 105 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 82 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 42 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 35 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 290 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 232 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 66 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 53 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 18 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 14 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 48 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 39 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 182 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 146 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 77 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 66 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 105 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 82 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 42 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 35 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Marginal Bone Loss Dear colleague, our data base included 110 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 92 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 27 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 23 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 8 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 7 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 19 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 16 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 74 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 62 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 23 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 20 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 51 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 43 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 9 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 9 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 110 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 92 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 27 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 23 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 8 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 7 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 19 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 16 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 74 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 62 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 23 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 20 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 51 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 43 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 9 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 9 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 110 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 92 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 27 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 23 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 8 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 7 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 19 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 16 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 74 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 62 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 74 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 62 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 23 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 20 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 9 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 9 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 290 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 232 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 66 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 53 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 18 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 14 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 48 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 39 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 182 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 146 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 77 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 66 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 105 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 82 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 42 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 35 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 290 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 232 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 66 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 53 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 18 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 14 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 48 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 39 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 182 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 146 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 77 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 66 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 105 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 82 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 42 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 35 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 290 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 232 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 66 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 53 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 18 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 14 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 48 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 39 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 182 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 146 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 77 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 66 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 105 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 82 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 42 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 35 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Repair related resorption (SurfPlot) Dear colleague, our data base included 110 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 92 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 27 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 23 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 8 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 7 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 19 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 16 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 74 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 62 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 74 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 62 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 23 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 20 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 51 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 43 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 9 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 9 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 110 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 92 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 27 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 23 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 8 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 7 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 19 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 16 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 23 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 20 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 51 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 43 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 9 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 9 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 110 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 92 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 27 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 23 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 8 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 7 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 19 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 16 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 74 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 62 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 23 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 20 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 51 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 43 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 9 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 9 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 290 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 232 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 66 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 53 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 18 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 14 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 48 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 39 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 182 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 146 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 77 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 66 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 105 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 82 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 42 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 35 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 290 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 232 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 66 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 53 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 18 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 14 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 48 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 39 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 182 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 146 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 77 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 66 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 105 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 82 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 42 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 35 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 290 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 232 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 66 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 53 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 18 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 14 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 48 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 39 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 182 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 146 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 77 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 66 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 105 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 82 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 42 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 35 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Follow-up (FollowUp) Dear colleague, our data base included 110 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 92 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 27 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 23 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 8 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 7 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 19 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 16 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 74 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 62 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 23 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 20 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 51 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 43 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 9 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 9 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 290 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 232 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 66 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 53 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 18 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 14 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 48 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 39 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 182 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 146 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 77 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 66 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 105 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 82 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Dear colleague, our data base included 42 teeth with the same diagnosis as yours. These teeth belong to 35 patients. The predicted risks of healing complications are shown in the tables and figures below.
Shaded area represents 95% confidence limits
The reported rate of infection related resorption is influenced by the profylactic pulp extirpation performed in this group of patients and should be interpreted as the rate of infection related resorption in patients where pulp extirpation have been performed.
Shaded area represents 95% confidence limits
Pulp necrosis
Pulp necrosis
Pulp necrosis
Pulp necrosis
Pulp necrosis
Pulp necrosis
Pulp necrosis
Pulp necrosis
Pulp necrosis
Pulp necrosis
Pulp necrosis
Pulp necrosis
Pulp necrosis
Pulp necrosis
Pulp necrosis
Pulp necrosis
Pulp necrosis
Pulp necrosis
Pulp necrosis
Pulp necrosis
Pulp necrosis
Pulp necrosis
Pulp necrosis
Pulp necrosis
Pulp necrosis
Pulp necrosis
Pulp necrosis
Pulp necrosis
Pulp necrosis
Pulp necrosis
Pulp necrosis
Pulp necrosis
Pulp necrosis
Pulp necrosis
Pulp necrosis
Pulp necrosis
Pulp necrosis
Pulp necrosis
Pulp necrosis
Pulp necrosis
Pulp necrosis
Pulp necrosis
Pulp necrosis
Pulp necrosis
Pulp necrosis
Pulp necrosis
Pulp necrosis
Pulp necrosis
Infection related resorption
Infection related resorption
Infection related resorption
Infection related resorption
Infection related resorption
Infection related resorption
Infection related resorption
Infection related resorption
Infection related resorption
Infection related resorption
Infection related resorption
Infection related resorption
Infection related resorption
Infection related resorption
Infection related resorption
Infection related resorption
Infection related resorption
Infection related resorption
Infection related resorption
Infection related resorption
Infection related resorption
Infection related resorption
Infection related resorption
Infection related resorption
Infection related resorption
Infection related resorption
Infection related resorption
Infection related resorption
Infection related resorption
Infection related resorption
Infection related resorption
Infection related resorption
Infection related resorption
Infection related resorption
Infection related resorption
Infection related resorption
Infection related resorption
Infection related resorption
Infection related resorption
Infection related resorption
Infection related resorption
Infection related resorption
Infection related resorption
Infection related resorption
Infection related resorption
Infection related resorption
Infection related resorption
Ankylosis resorption
Ankylosis resorption
Ankylosis resorption
Ankylosis resorption
Ankylosis resorption
Ankylosis resorption
Ankylosis resorption
Ankylosis resorption
Ankylosis resorption
Ankylosis resorption
Ankylosis resorption
Ankylosis resorption
Ankylosis resorption
Ankylosis resorption
Ankylosis resorption
Ankylosis resorption
Ankylosis resorption
Ankylosis resorption
Ankylosis resorption
Ankylosis resorption
Ankylosis resorption
Ankylosis resorption
Ankylosis resorption
Ankylosis resorption
Ankylosis resorption
Ankylosis resorption
Ankylosis resorption
Ankylosis resorption
Ankylosis resorption
Ankylosis resorption
Ankylosis resorption
Ankylosis resorption
Ankylosis resorption
Ankylosis resorption
Ankylosis resorption
Ankylosis resorption
Ankylosis resorption
Ankylosis resorption
Ankylosis resorption
Ankylosis resorption
Ankylosis resorption
Ankylosis resorption
Ankylosis resorption
Ankylosis resorption
Ankylosis resorption
Ankylosis resorption
Ankylosis resorption
Ankylosis resorption
Ankylosis resorption
Tooth loss
Tooth loss
Tooth loss
Tooth loss
Tooth loss
Tooth loss
Tooth loss
Tooth loss
Tooth loss
Tooth loss
Tooth loss
Tooth loss
Tooth loss
Tooth loss
Tooth loss
Tooth loss
Tooth loss
Tooth loss
Tooth loss
Tooth loss
Tooth loss
Tooth loss
Tooth loss
Tooth loss
Tooth loss
Tooth loss
Tooth loss
Tooth loss
Tooth loss
Tooth loss
Tooth loss
Tooth loss
Tooth loss
Tooth loss
Tooth loss
Tooth loss
Tooth loss
Tooth loss
Tooth loss
Tooth loss
Tooth loss
Tooth loss
Tooth loss
Tooth loss
Tooth loss
Tooth loss
Tooth loss
Tooth loss
Statistical overview
Statistical overview
Statistical overview
Statistical overview
Statistical overview
Statistical overview
Statistical overview
Statistical overview
Statistical overview
Statistical overview
Statistical overview
Statistical overview
Statistical overview
Statistical overview
Statistical overview
Statistical overview
Statistical overview
Statistical overview
Statistical overview
Statistical overview
Statistical overview
Statistical overview
Statistical overview
Statistical overview
Statistical overview
Statistical overview
Statistical overview
Statistical overview
Statistical overview
Statistical overview
Statistical overview
Statistical overview
Statistical overview
Statistical overview
Statistical overview
Statistical overview
Statistical overview
Statistical overview
Statistical overview
Statistical overview
Statistical overview
Statistical overview
Statistical overview
Statistical overview
Statistical overview
Statistical overview
Statistical overview
Statistical overview
Statistical overview
Pulp canal obliteration
Pulp canal obliteration
Pulp canal obliteration
Pulp canal obliteration
Pulp canal obliteration
Pulp canal obliteration
Pulp canal obliteration
Pulp canal obliteration
Pulp canal obliteration
Pulp canal obliteration
Pulp canal obliteration
Pulp canal obliteration
Pulp canal obliteration
Pulp canal obliteration
Pulp canal obliteration
Pulp canal obliteration
Pulp canal obliteration
Pulp canal obliteration
Pulp canal obliteration
Pulp canal obliteration
Pulp canal obliteration
Pulp canal obliteration
Pulp canal obliteration
Pulp canal obliteration
Pulp canal obliteration
Pulp canal obliteration
Pulp canal obliteration
Pulp canal obliteration
Pulp canal obliteration
Pulp canal obliteration
Pulp canal obliteration
Pulp canal obliteration
Pulp canal obliteration
Pulp canal obliteration
Pulp canal obliteration
Pulp canal obliteration
Pulp canal obliteration
Pulp canal obliteration
Pulp canal obliteration
Pulp canal obliteration
Pulp canal obliteration
Pulp canal obliteration
Pulp canal obliteration
Pulp canal obliteration
Pulp canal obliteration
Pulp canal obliteration
Pulp canal obliteration
Pulp canal obliteration
Pulp canal obliteration
Marginal bone loss
Marginal bone loss
Marginal bone loss
Marginal bone loss
Marginal bone loss
Marginal bone loss
Marginal bone loss
Marginal bone loss
Marginal bone loss
Marginal bone loss
Marginal bone loss
Marginal bone loss
Marginal bone loss
Marginal bone loss
Marginal bone loss
Marginal bone loss
Marginal bone loss
Marginal bone loss
Marginal bone loss
Marginal bone loss
Marginal bone loss
Marginal bone loss
Marginal bone loss
Marginal bone loss
Marginal bone loss
Marginal bone loss
Marginal bone loss
Marginal bone loss
Marginal bone loss
Marginal bone loss
Marginal bone loss
Marginal bone loss
Marginal bone loss
Marginal bone loss
Marginal bone loss
Marginal bone loss
Marginal bone loss
Marginal bone loss
Marginal bone loss
Marginal bone loss
Marginal bone loss
Marginal bone loss
Marginal bone loss
Marginal bone loss
Marginal bone loss
Marginal bone loss
Marginal bone loss
Marginal bone loss
Repair related resorption
Repair related resorption
Repair related resorption
Repair related resorption
Repair related resorption
Repair related resorption
Repair related resorption
Repair related resorption
Repair related resorption
Repair related resorption
Repair related resorption
Repair related resorption
Repair related resorption
Repair related resorption
Repair related resorption
Repair related resorption
Repair related resorption
Repair related resorption
Repair related resorption
Repair related resorption
Repair related resorption
Repair related resorption
Repair related resorption
Repair related resorption
Repair related resorption
Repair related resorption
Repair related resorption
Repair related resorption
Repair related resorption
Repair related resorption
Repair related resorption
Repair related resorption
Repair related resorption
Repair related resorption
Repair related resorption
Repair related resorption
Repair related resorption
Repair related resorption
Repair related resorption
Repair related resorption
Repair related resorption
Repair related resorption
Repair related resorption
Repair related resorption
Repair related resorption
Repair related resorption
Repair related resorption
Repair related resorption
Follow up
Follow up
Follow up
Follow up
Follow up
Follow up
Follow up
Follow up
Follow up
Follow up
Follow up
Follow up
Follow up
Follow up
Follow up
Follow up